Designs for launching payloads to orbit rely on expendable liquid kerosone or hydrogen fuel sources. This is a costly due to the high cost of design and construction of ultra light weight tanks using aluminum-lithium alloys. We propose reusable LCH4/LOX fuel tanks concentricly aligned which are fully reuseable to provide 1 ½ or 2 stage rocket lift platforms.

Compared to LCH4 kerosone has a 30% lower power exiting a rocket noozle and hydrogen requires a large volume tank compared to LCH4. Less payload can be launched with kerosone and by shrinking the fuel tank size relative to hydrogen less aerodynamic drag on the nose of the rocket occurs lower cost and raising performance. By flying back and recovering the tank assemblies the launch costs could be reduced 20-50%.

Illustration 1 demostrates the tank assembly using LCH4 in a core fuel tank and the surrounding LOX tank. The external pressure on the concentric LCH4 tank from the surrounding LOX tank assists in keeping the internal liquid methane tank wall thickness far thinner than standard tank designs. The LOX maintains the LCH4 below liquidfication temperature since the LOX temperature is near 10 degrees celcius lower than liquid LCH4. This lowers weight by reducing insulation needed and simplifies methane tank design. The inner LCH4 and outer LOX are coupled together with thin bulk heads and longerons are intergral to the LOX tank for structural support during landing. The inner LCH4 tank would be thermally pre-strained in compression to lower the LOX tank crippling load from the nose cone aerodynamic pressure during flight.

Illustration 2 reveals the landing mode for the flyback booster. LCH4/LOX flyback booster seperation occurs from the primary payload launch core tank assembly and the booster deploys the landing gear from the front nose cone area and the rear thermally shielded base of the booster. A large high speed parachute may be incorporated in order to slow the boosters descent. Large fins and a rudder assist in flying back the booster rocket. Canards may be required that deploy from the boosters nose cone also to gain more lift and control for landing.

Ilustration 3 demonstrates how multiple boosters may be coupled to vary the payload assembly weight and size to meet most any requirements. The boosters are connected to the payload at three points. Two fixed connections at the base develop the lift for the primary payload assembly. This lower connection relieves any payload axial crushing forces thus producing a lighter liquid fly back booster. The upper coupling would be a slider connection in order to prevent stress from developing from thermal contraction during filling the LCH4/LOX at launch. During seperation the slip connector would be released and the aerodynamic drag naturally seperates the liquid fly back booster from the payload assembly.

Voting

Voting is closed!

Tags

Aerospace, Manufacturing, Spacecraft, Vehicles,

ABOUT THE ENTRANT

Name: Mark Rode

Type of entry: individual

Profession: Engineer/Designer

Number of times previously entering contest:never

Mark's favorite design and analysis tools:
COMSOL

For managing CAD data Mark's company uses: CAD free

Mark's hobbies and activities:
Computer Building Engineering Energy Space

Mark is inspired by:
Green solutions to energy needs in the USA and world class engineering solutions.

Space Technology in the field of creative Mechanical Engineering Design Technolgy

Software used for this entry:
open office and free cad

Patent status: none