Binary Vaccinations

Votes: 0
Views: 2669
Medical
Previous Next

Infectious agents, like bacteria and viruses, tend to be both really nasty and really inventive. No sooner do we invest millions in research to find successful vaccine, than we learn that the bug we are trying to kill has successfully developed a new defense against our work. Given this never ending war, is there any way to win the war against these agents and end the terrible cost in human life and misery they exact?

Innovation

The ability of infectious agents to use mutation to generate a successful defense has thwarted our attempts to rid the world of them entirely. However, this ability can also be used against them. Imagine a two-part vaccine, given at two separate occasions, neither of which would harm the existing natural world. Vaccine 1 would be a tailor-made attack agent designed to make the infectious agent just a little bit sick. Sick enough that is so that it develops a defense with known key flaws we can exploit. When we are pretty sure the infectious agent is well again, so to speak, we administer Vaccine 2, which exploits this weakness, killing the infectious agent. Since infectious agents often adapt by incorporating random genes, it might even be possible to create a marking system that makes the infectious agents easier to identify and track. For example, glowing is not a trait that would affect a bacteria’s survival, but would make searching for the infectious agent much easier to visualize. The possibilities are endless. For example, a hospital might release a faulty infectious agent into the wild which is harmless, yet capable of co-existing with its not harmless cousins. The specific markers present in the harmless agent would cross-pollinate with the harmful agents, making both easier to track and identify easily. Manual sanitation efforts would be much more effective as the harmless agent would live in the same environs as the harmful ones.

Manufacturability

Like all pharmaceuticals, these agents would have to go through the FDA approval process. Once approved, the process of growing, maintaining, and distributing bacteria and viruses is well understood and very profitable.

Marketability

The ability to use a cheap and plentiful vector to “infect” the infectious is almost too easy to sell. Locations that need to be sure of safe and clean rooms could use Vaccine 1 alone. The ability to set harmless markers within patient’s bodies without affecting their health would advance the accuracy of targeted therapies, potentially saving many lives. Setting more than one marker type would allow researchers model biological processes with great accuracy, advancing medical knowledge.

Cost-effectiveness

While vaccine production costs are well understood, the developmental cost associated with bring these type of agents to market vary with the expertise of the organization completing the research, and the tenacity of the target infection to avoid characterization. However, once in production, a successful immunization program should eradicate the disease from an affected population if the program is administered properly.

Voting

Voting is closed!

  • ABOUT THE ENTRANT

  • Name:
    Steven Lathrop
  • Type of entry:
    individual
  • Profession:
    Software Engineer
  • Number of times previously entering contest:
    never
  • Steven's favorite design and analysis tools:
    Aonix ObjectAda(ETS), AdaCore GPS, Microsoft Visual Basic, Autodesk AutoCad, ORCAD
  • For managing CAD data Steven's company uses:
    None
  • Steven's hobbies and activities:
    Woodworking using a CNC Wood Router
  • Steven belongs to these online communities:
    LinkedIn
  • Steven is inspired by:
    Elegant design; those designs that just sing. No one needs to explain it, it just makes sense the first time everyone sees it.
    I love those challenges that push the envelope just a bit further than any sane person should.
  • Patent status:
    none